Food

Coffee Culture

Mar 14 2009, 12:53 pm

Appreciating Coffee Like Wine

baldwin mar11 coffeebeans_stirling noyes.jpg

Photo by Stirling Noyes/Flickr CC

At lunch last weekend I overheard someone at another table say that when she wanted a greater caffeine buzz, she chose a different roast. I can't remember whether she chose darker or lighter roast for the greater buzz, but it doesn't matter; both answers were wrong. The effect of coffee roasting on caffeine content is so negligible as to be immeasurable except under tightly controlled laboratory conditions.

We generally estimate caffeine content to average 1% for coffea Arabica and 2% for Robusta (coffea Canephora) by weight. The real issue is the caffeine content of the cultivar, i.e. the species (Arabica or Robusta) and especially the variety of the coffee within the species. [Curator's note: As Jerry helped teach me for my book, good coffee -- everything Peet's and also Starbucks sells -- is Arabica.]

The word "varietal" is often incorrectly used referring to coffee. "Variety" or "varietal" is an important word to an American wine producer since our tradition is to label wines by varietal, eg. Zinfandel. In France or Italy, the tradition is to label by the appellation where the wine is grown, and most wines are blends. But generally only coffee professionals encounter the variety of coffee; the consumer rarely knows whether she is drinking Catuai (red or yellow), Caturra, Typica, Mundo Novo, SL28, or Kent, to pick six of the more than 3000 named Arabica varieties. [Curator's note: For single origin coffees, what customers see is a name derived from the country of origin like Guatemala Antigua or a specific farm like Guatemala San Sebastian; for blends you'll see a proprietary name, like Peet's Major Dickason's Blend.]

Back to caffeine. In a couple of studies testing 90 different Arabica cultivars, the caffeine content varied between 0.42 and 2.9%. My morning cup would then vary between 84 and 580 milligrams, depending on which of these varieties was in my cup.

If your morning cup came from a commercial roaster who included Robusta in the blend, we have another level of complexity. Caffeine content in these coffees, in one study, varied between 1.16 and 4.0%. A straight 12 oz. cup, using 20 grams of the 4% coffee, probably wouldn't taste very good, but would definitely provide more buzz: 800 milligrams of caffeine.

As with most things, the more one learns, the more complex a topic becomes and, in a sense, the less one knows. To attempt accurate generalization:

    • Arabica averages about half the caffeine as Robusta.
    • The cultivar determines the caffeine content.
    • Degree of roast has no meaningful effect on caffeine.
    • An espresso made from 100% Arabica, on average, has about 70 milligrams of caffeine per shot; a 12 oz. cup of drip coffee made my way in a press pot, using two scoops of coffee per 12-ounce cup -- would have 200 milligrams.

Beware of taking this information very far, because individual responses to caffeine differ widely. Caffeine is metabolized faster by men and slowest by pregnant women. Body weight and eating will affect caffeine absorption.

And don't go running to your coffee store asking which variety a given coffee is. Coffee buyers are concerned with taste, which they want to reflect the origin. While different cultivars grown in the same soil do taste different, it's a bit beside the point of the flavor of the origin (terroir, if you like). We want the taste of our single origin coffees to reflect where they were grown.

No doubt many have used caffeine for stimulation (Balzac wrote an ode to the effects of his 40 cups per day.) I can't say that I have never used coffee as an energizer, but at Peet's we don't think of ourselves as part of a caffeine delivery system. We're part of the pleasure delivery system. When you sip your coffee, think of how good it tastes.

Comments (14)

Now that we're clear on that - let's discuss Tea.

coffee man (Replying to: Candide)

Great coffee information. I have worked for a artisan gourmet coffee company for several years and I always thought and was told that the darker you roast coffee, like French Roast the less caffeine it well have. I figured if I wanted a caffeine jolt I need to go with a light roast. I prefer a dark roast coffee.

coffee man
http://www.gourmetcoffeeonline.com

This is really helpful. I have Peet's coffee every morning even before I get out of bed. I recently took a fresh roasted bag of Peet's, Blend 101, to Japan for a coffee consultant friend (I'm writing a book on coffee and cafes in Japan) and he broke open a bean and declared it perfectly roasted. If you can make it in Japan, you can make it anywhere. By the way, the Japanese wisdom on caffeine is that it is a good thing, and decaf is a very low seller except to foreigners. If you have had too much, which of course is a personal measure, you eat an umeboshi, or pickled plum.
Again, thank you,
Corky White

gr33n3gg.myopenid.com

Great, awesome article.
I also heard that a darker roast results in more caffeine.

I find the title of this article rather ironic, given the issue outlined in the opening sentence. Could you imagine an article titled "Appreciating Wine Like Jagermeister" -- inspired by overhearing a conversation about finding a wine that will get the person more inebriated?

There are lovers of coffee, and then there are users.

And the blind robusta bashing is an unfounded myth. Rarely have I ever had a good espresso blend that's 100% Arabica. Take some of the washed robustas coming out of India and Papua New Guinea these days -- they're handled with more care than a lot of arabicas.

And I beg to differ that varietals aren't used by retailers, roasters, and buyers in coffee. I very much know what I'm looking for when buying a "Panama Duncan Estate Micro-Lot #1" or a "Guatemala El Injerto", the latter of which being a recent Cup of Excellence coffee. To ignore the varietal, and the farm, would be to open yourself to deceit and fakery when it comes to pretty much any Cup of Excellence-awarded coffee.

Caffeine content is appreciating coffee like wine? Only if you appreciate wine like an alcoholic.

Jerry Baldwin

swag,
You're quite right to comment on the headline; it's misleading about the content. There is a similar debate in wine, though--about alcohol levels. In California it's become common to see red wines (mostly Zinfandel and Cabernet Sauvignon) containing alcohol levels of 15-16%. These same wines, 15 years ago, were commonly 12-13%. With both beverages, an informed drinker will be happier with his choices.
Jerry

Jerry Baldwin

Gee, swag, I'm not sure what I did to upset you. I didn't write the headline, and the editor has apologized.

The point of the post was to establish two things: roast color has no effect on caffeine content and caffeine levels vary widely among coffees even from the same country of origin, owing to different cultivars. I was certainly not promoting any coffee because of high caffeine content. This is how I finished my post: "We're part of the pleasure delivery system. When you sip your coffee, think of how good it tastes."

I've personally tried to stay as far from "varietal" as possible since it is the word used for wines that are made from at least 75% of a particular grape variety. As a coffee professional, as apparently you are, I want the coffee discussion to be about coffee, not about wine or any lame allusion to wine. Coffee is significantly more complicated than wine; it's from a tree not a vine, and it's grown in tropical not temperate cultures, it's usually drunk hot, and roasters must rely on consumers to brew it well to fully appreciate our work. And on and on.

I certainly didn't "blindly trash" Robusta; I only said that a cup of 100% Robusta probably wouldn't taste very good and that Robusta, on average, had about double the caffeine as Arabica.

Nor did I suggest ignoring the farm or what they have planted. Many if not most farms, following smart horticultural practice, plant more than one cultivar, sometimes of different varieties, and especially in Central America sometimes on different rootstock because of the severe nematode problems in some areas. I did say that coffee buyers of my acquaintance are most concerned with what is in the cup. I'll definitely stick by that.

We would probably agree more than we disagree, but I'm sticking with 100% Arabica, even for espresso. Whenever we have tried blending with Robusta, even some the origins you suggest, we strongly prefer the 100% Arabica. Interesting to me, careful Italian and French roasters are going in that direction as well. Even Lavazza, the Folgers of Italy has 100% Arabica blends and 10% Robusta blends that are at the high priced part of their offerings.

If you'd like to continue this more directly, send your contact info to webmail@peets.com.

Thanks for your interest and for taking the time to post.

Jerry Baldwin

Hi again, swag,

I forgot to add to the "varietal" discussion that most people use "varietal" when they mean a country of origin. Eg. Costa Rica Tarrazu is not a varietal, but "Typica" is a variety traditionally planted in that area of Costa Rica. I prefer the term "single origin" because it doesn't contain the inaccuracy or confusion of "varietal."

Yeah, well (Mr. Baldwin, I assume you're connected with Peet's), the problem with Peet's is that every month you're pushing a new coffee and when there's a good one it never lasts. Last month was something blue (type) from Sumatra, which was OUTSTANDING and it was gone in a flash; every Peet's in San Francisco was out of it in a few days and there was not another roasting. Maybe if we're lucky there may be another batch a year from now. Or maybe not.

Most Peet's coffees are produced for the average drinker, meaning not too full-flavored, like Major Dickenson's. Boring. About a year ago was another one made from berries picked on the moon or something (forget the name) and that was outstanding too. Peet stores in SF were out of it in a few days. Peet's says they don't know if it will ever appear again.

Why don't you make a great coffee that is available all the time? And I don't mean the "French Roast" and other bland blends. I know they sell, but veuillez give nous un break. Are you in the marketing business (a new type every month) or the coffee business?

Caffeine content we don't care about unless it's decaffeinated, but taste we do.

I keep seeing young adults around me reaching out for energy drinks like red bulls instead of coffee. Makes me wonder if the coffee is losing its charm with the next generation. Though, lets meet up for coffee would always sound better than let's meet for energy drink.

Excellent article Jerry. I know that I have the luxury of being able to appreciate the fresh roasted coffee for both pure enjoyment of the roasting arts and as a energy delivery when needed. What I find amusing is the placebo effect a darker roast gives to the average coffee consumer. I try and educated my customers but there is still that myth of 'the darker the roast the "stronger" the cup'. Keep up the educating!

-Ryan
www.labeancoffee.com

Ask most wine drinkers about their favorite wines and at the very least, they'll probably be able to tell you why they like it, what kind of grapes it is made from, where those grapes were grown and in what year.
Ask many coffee drinkers about their favorite coffee, and they're more likely to answer with a brand name, a level of roast or, heaven forbid, with "a mocha."

I want to melt the crayons over a wine bottle, can anyone tell me how to go about doing that?

promotional wines

Post a comment