Food

Jun 4 2009, 8:57 am

Better Starbucks Food Can't Come Soon Enough

As Starbucks started hitting troubles even before the economy last year, Howard Schultz, back at the fore, announced as if it were a done deal that the embarrassingly sawdust-y baked goods would be first to go--and to get better. I was heartened. Even if you're not supposed to think about the "and' in the "coffee and" when you're a serious coffee man, you'd like a nice choice--especially if you believe that baked goods should make up an extremely imbalanced portion of the daily diet.

Alas. The profusion of locally baked muffins and scones I expected to proliferate across the land failed to appear. Just the same sawdust, from airport to airport and mall to mall. The company was too busy retraining baristas and installing single-brew Clover machines, and not removing the breakfast foods that were also part of the Schultz vows to think about baked goods.

Lost sales have a way of focusing the mind, and so, I would think, do calorie-labeling laws like New York's and the many other states, like California and Massachusetts, whose own requirements will soon kick in and show people that, for instance, a doughnut often has fewer calories than a muffin or cookie. Okay--I'll have the doughnut!

So now Starbucks will, it says, reformulate 90 percent of its baked goods, removing high-fructose corn syrup and preservatives where possible, and coming up with recipes that have tens rather than dozens of ingredients. "Food has been the Achilles' heel of the company," Michelle Gass in charge of marketing, told Reuters. Yes, ma'am!

She didn't say whether cookies and muffins will still be almost uniformly more than 400 calories or whether they will use local vendors where possible and allow them any latitude in thinking of what they'd like to make for the local market--or whether the flavor will improve. But there's 90 percent room for hope.

Comments (4)

Ironically, Starbucks has amazing food in China, and it costs 50 or 75 cents for a $4.95 sandwich...

theblueamerican

The other thing about Starbucks that has me upset is how they walked away from serving low calorie and low sugar food for type 2 diabetics such as myself. It's a scary day when McDonald's has food that is just as good.

AverageJane2

I loved going there, for years... then slowly but surely any food item I liked was removed. Trailmix cookies, gone. Poppyseed danish, gone. All that was left was cakey, dense or weird stuff. I drove through one everyday for coffee and a sweet treat but once they removed the only things I liked I wasn't motivated to keep going. I figured they took out the items that costed more to produce -- it couldn't have been popularity -- those items were almost always the first to sell out, before noon. Ah, better for my waistline this way, I'd lost my taste for the chemical syrups they used anyways. I do miss their iced lattes, made just right, though.

I had a delicious key lime bar at a Starbuck's at ORD. Other than that I've never tried one of their sawdusty-looking baked goods...

Post a comment