Photo by Pink Sherbet Photography/FlickrCC
Kids who go to high schools located within 500 feet of a fast food outlet are fatter than kids whose schools are further away, according to a study in the March American Journal of Public Health. The Los Angeles Times took a look, mapped the fast food places near several local high schools, and found no lack of them. Are kids generally fatter because they have easier access to fast food? Or is that the only kind of food available? Or are fast food outlets a marker for unhealthy neighborhoods?
Whatever. The Times quotes an NRA spokesman arguing that the study doesn't mean a thing. I can understand why the NRA might be worried. What if cities stopped allowing fast food outlets near schools? That's just what the Los Angeles city council tried to do last year. With some research evidence to back up the idea, this study might kick off a national trend.
And maybe, just maybe, kids might start eating healthier meals at school?
SHOP THE ATLANTIC FOOD MARKETPLACE
Subscribe to Atlantic Food
Interpreting this is fairly straightforward. I think it is fairly obvious that kids who go to high schools located within 500 feet of a fast food outlet are more likely to eat at those outlets than kids whose schools are further away.
A chance to get away from school and spend a dollar or 5 to get food?
I'd do it.
I thought I saw a show on public broadcasting about eating healthy programs (with healthy food alternatives) being implemented in some schools.
I find it hard to believe that kids will eat healthier simply by them moving the restaurants away. There needs to be something to eat besides pizza, hot dogs and burgers in the schools too.