Photo by LDCross/Flickr CC
I'm embarrassed to admit it, but my first thought after reading Aglaia Kremezi's vivid account of slaughtering a pig was, Gross. Dedicated vegetarian or not (and I am), the phrase "head cheese" is upsetting the first time you hear it--especially when it comes with photos. But then I read the piece again and something changed. I looked past words like "innards" and "cleaver" and started to see the beautiful Greek traditions Aglaia wrote about, the ancient culture that has celebrated pork the same ceremonious way for centuries. (It also helps that Aglaia is a wonderful writer and one of the sweetest people on the planet.)
I looked at the bright, smiling faces in Aglaia's photo as they held the severed head of the pig and resisted my knee-jerk reaction that meat is "wrong." I thought how silly it would be to tell these people to eat tofu instead, and what a loss to Greek culture, to all culture, it would be if they did. Food is absolutely central to the cultures that make the world so interesting, and that food includes meat, sometimes at its center. Imagine Greek Easter with Morningstar faux lamb, Buenos Aires parrillas serving tofu steak, or Deer Hunter Appalachia giving up rifles for mushroom foraging, and you'll understand why the cost of universal vegetarianism would be perhaps too high.
But meat remains bad for the environment, bad for your health, and really bad for the animals who die to produce it. What to do? In a culinary landscape marked by an increasingly sophisticated love of food (including meat) and by a rising awareness of environmental and dietary concerns surrounding food (especially meat), a compromise is emerging. It looks a lot like vegetarianism without being actual vegetarianism, that controversial ideology that has come to be as much political as dietary. You get all the benefits--be healthier, help animals, save the environment--with none of the sacrifices. You can still have bacon. You can still enjoy Pennsylvania hunting trips and Greek slaughtering celebrations and turkey at Thanksgiving.
I see no problems--ethical, dietary, or culinary--with what I like to call semitarianism: A diet of sometimes vegetarianism, sometimes omnivorism.This new movement is taking a few different forms, but the constant tenet is to set a schedule for yourself with your dietary life divided into two different categories: times when you eat meat and times when you don't.
Perhaps the most popular manifestation is Mark Bittman's recent edict, "vegetarian before dinnertime": he eats no meat until supper, when all bets are off. It works. Bittman reports eyebrow-raising advances in his health without having to give up the food he's built a life and career around.
There are other schedules, other ways. Paul McCartney recently endorsed "Meat Free Mondays." A lifelong vegetarian friend allows herself meat on holidays and special occasions--and this is a girl who loves locally farmed heirloom beans the way most people love bacon. A food-loving colleague eats meat only on weekends, which "makes tons of sense for my busy single life," he says. "Plus, I feel healthier, and absence makes the heart grow fonder for meat, too."
Whether the right course for you is all-out vegetarianism or merely mitigated meat depends on whether you see meat as an indulgence similar to alcohol: a social norm harmless in careful moderation. Or whether you see meat more like cigarettes--a harmful vice at any level.
For me, the latter view makes sense, though that has a bit to do with my addictive personality (I can either eat three burgers a week or no burgers at all) as well as my moral qualms. But I see no problems--ethical, dietary, or culinary--with what I like to call semitarianism: A diet of sometimes vegetarianism, sometimes omnivorism.
Don't confuse it with so-called "flexitarianism," a reduced-meat diet undertaken for temporary budgetary relief and weight loss. Gourmet explains that the economic downturn has caused a parallel downturn in consumption of pricey meat. If that's flexitarianism, then it's a nice step forward, but it misses the point. Presumably, once adherents hit their target weight or save up enough money, it's back to daily cheeseburgers. That's not vegetarianism (or semitarianism) any more than the South Beach diet. Real commitment of any kind is borne out of philosophical conviction, and that conviction is no less legitimate for food-lovers who abstain from meat one day a week or all seven.
Photo by Gio_JL/FlickrCC
If you want to give semitarian eating a taste, try these recipes inspired by the wonderful but meat-heavy cooking of Tyler Florence. You'll find it's easy to make a meaty dish meatless without sacrificing flavor or fun.
Baked Rigatoni with Eggplant and Meatless Sausage
Mushroom French Onion Soup

Thanks for giving it a name... In our house, we call it "playing with our food." That is, for health, humanitarian, and ecological reasons, in the past 6 months, we have switched to an organic/sustainable/humanely raised/no antibiotics or growth hormones shopping and eating plan.. We have converted from 7 day a week omnivorism to being meatless on mondays... and are eating fish at least twice a week as well. The rest of the week? We eat anything that sounds good so long as it fits the new shopping plan, and are increasingly trendy towards eating less meat altogether. It's been fun, beneficial, and slenderizing.
Excellent!
John
I read this article based on the In N Out picture... so good. And yes, its the In N Out grilled cheese that you can order. You actually don't miss the patty too much when you have all the accoutrements: special sauce, grilled onions, etc.
My wife and I have been on the semitarian diet for a few years. All the meals that we prepare at home are vegetarian. Veggie pasta, stir fry, soups, chili, etc. are all meatless. We do use eggs occasionally and might throw some frozen Trader Joe's shrimp into the mix. But we eat so much healthier and we don't have to deal with defrosting animal muscle and putting other nastiness into our kitchen. That being said, we do like to go out (probably once or twice at week) and eat a good burger or have Thai food somewhere. We can generally get better meats at a nice restaurant (definitely not at our local Thai joint though) and we don't have to worry about buying meats at the markets. Certainly not hard at all nowadays to cut out a lot of our meat intake.
Whew! I thought you meant "eat Jews."
Its not anything other than omnivorism. Healthier omnivorism, maybe, but why some up with a separate name? Most of human history we ate less meat, more veg than the late 20th century/modern diet.
I think its a good move, but the need to define it as a type of movement seems off to me somehow.
Personally, I am not a fan of eating grain-fed caged-animal foods and consider them unhealthy for a substantial portion of the population. I feel exactly the same way when it comes to vegan and most vegetarian diets. Instead, I eat what my research has shown to be what Nature intended, which is a diet of free-range grass and grub-fed animal products and ripe sweet fruit. The largest "clinical trial" in the history of our species (conducted by Nature over 100,000 generations) has proven to me that this diet is the healthiest and most ecologically sustainable. Of course, there are no recent studies based on this diet because virtually nobody eats this way as a result of having been brainwashed by the AgriGiants and feedlot meat production industries.
For those interested in a discussion of the unsustainability of planting annual monocrops such as wheat, corn and soy (all require huge amounts of fossil fuels and manmade chemical processing to produce), and the benefits of raising animals on perennial grass (no planting, no fertilizing, no pesticides), read: "The Vegetarian Myth" by Lierre Keith and "Against the Grain" by Richard Manning (researches the ethical, political, ecological, and nutritional deficits of a vegetarian diet).
For those interested in reading about a fascinating experiment based on Nature to provide a healthy life in harmony with our environment, read my book"The Original Diet - The Omnivore's Solution". Ask your librarian to obtain copies and you can read them for free.
Roy Mankovitz, Director
www.MontecitoWellness.com
The argument that this is any different than Flexitarianism is specious -- has the author even looked at Peter Berley's Flexitarian Table?
Also, Fisher seems to have missed the Great. Big. Pollan. Edict: Eat food, not too much, mostly plants.
I've been following this for a year without giving it a name. In my variation, I don't eat poultry, pork, or beef except in small quantities at the holidays, as long as I can be sure it comes from free range animals slaughtered humanely, and confine seafood to once or twice a week. I have kind of a hierarchy in place in my mind for those occasions when travel, lack of options, or my anemia forces me to get some non-bean or nut-based protein. I'll eat chicken before beef, and pork not at all. I have a soft spot in my heart for pigs, intelligent and clean animals. I started this diet when I drove through the Central Valley twice in a week--locals call it Cowschwitz--and stopped getting any pleasure at all from beef, although I'd never gotten much.
My health and general sense of well-being have improved, as well as my energy level. The only problem I have is in cooking for my husband, who still needs his meat, although he's cut back. It's not the cooking that's the problem; it's getting meat in sufficiently small quantities that I don't have to be bothered with freezing and defrosting. Buying small quantities was hard enough for two people; it's nearly impossible for one. Why, oh why, do grocery stores insist on selling everything in such large quantities? There's always the butcher's counter, of course, but even there, it's hard to buy a quarter of a chicken breast.